Erection & Scrotal problems- Who respected my wishes

Erection&Scrotal problems–Who respected my wishes

 

I have made many comments about the type of examinations some Urologists

 are doing on people. And with my complaints against Urologists, you must think
 I make a complaint against every Urologist. ...  Not so ....

I have seen many Urologists in my quest to find justice against those that didn’t

respect my wishes & abused me. But one has to be fair. Whereas one out of
3 Urologists abused me; 2 out of 3 did not. 66% respected my wishes. 

In respect to those that do respect the patients wishes, I am informing you of

those who respected my wishes & of those who did not. There are of course,
many  Urologists who I have not seen.

What does a patient want when they visit a medical specialist –

       1)      Our wishes to be respected

2)      To be informed
3)    Seek permission if they intend to do anything.
                                                                                                                                          

Urologists who respected my wishes (No particular order)

       1)      Mr Mark Fraundorfer , Tauranga  - showed a great deal of respect.

Acted in my best interests.  I  can’t recommend him highly enough.

2)      Mr John Tuckey – Auckland

3)      Mr Dirk Drent  - Auckland

4)      Mr David Merrilees – Auckland

5)      Mr Mischel Neill – Auckland

6)      Mr Michael Mackay – Auckland

7)      Mr Glen Devcich – Hamilton

8)      Mr Michael Cresswell  –  Rotorua (1988). I really appreciated

the value of this appointment.

.....Plus others.....

Urologists who did not respect my wishes

       1)      Urologist (deceased) – from 1987

2)      Mr N, Whangarei  - Despite advising him how things were

improving following Dr R’s examination, pulled up & under my

scrotum rather vigoursly resulting in a bleed, bruising & a

haemorrhage in the perinneal area.

 

Health Disabilities Commission (HDC)  response  – a normal examination

carried out. No comment on the haemorrhage.

So we can assume that for the HDC this examination was acceptable.

3)      Urologist , Hamilton – Out of all the Urologists I have seen, he was one

 of the most informative, yet he suddenly turned around & twisted the

top of my left testicle causing it to fall on its side. Considering our

discussion, it is hard to fathom this turnaround of events.

The HDC’s reponse. A normal examination.  No comment on the

twisting of the testicle.  So one must ask, if the HDC feels that the

twisting of ones  testicle causing it to fall on its side  is acceptable

to them . How many other patients are being compromised.  Is this

normal practice. Is it widespread, this abusing of patients.

As far as I am concerned, It is :

                                  unacceptable practice by this Urologist.

BUT acceptable by the HDC

4)      Dr M, Hastings – When I clearly advise a Urologist of the dangers

of doing a certain type of examination & he does it anyway, what is

his reason.

a)      Revenge

b)      He believes he’s God & can do anything he wants

c)       Hes trying to cover-up the results of the previous examinations

 

              Result : the septum drops resulting in a collapse of the perinneal area.
              Once again The HDC feel  this is a normal and acceptable examination .
 

This Urologist has changed everything, he has changed the direction.

 

Lastly,

Urologists who produce fraudulent reports from their consultations

             1)      Urologist, Auckland -  After a referral from Dr R, produced a 

fraudulent report, which in many  aspects  mirrored Dr R’s

fraudulent  report.

Erection & Scrotal problems - Undeniable pieces of Proof

Erection & Scrotal problems - Undeniable pieces of Proof

                                                  Manipulation of septum area

 

    Undeniable pieces of Evidence that supports my claims.

 

 

1)       APR 2013 – Following an examination where Dr R repeatedly examines my

         left testicle, Dr R referred me for NON EXISTENT PAIN.
 

2)       APR 2013- After seeing Dr R again, after his examination, Dr R writes a referral

to a Urologist, that my “left testicle has now dropped and feels shrunken

following examination recently” (his own words)

 

3)       MAY 2013 –   I receive a phone call from- DR Urologist, Middlemore Hospital

 who calls me after referral for pain. I say to him “what pain”.
 

4)       MAY 2013 - In response to my complaint to the HDC, Dr R claimed
 

i)                   That on examination ‘ his testes in fact appeared to be normal

 in position and shape’ .    (This is probably one of the few pieces

of truth in his whole report. It was normal at the start of the

examination). 

ii)                That I had been  the subject of a forceful scrotal wrenching while

having a massage when insisting to be finished off properly.
 

5)       There is one very serious flaw with Dr R’s claim. I believe in maintaining

energy in the body. I prefer ‘not to ejaculate’.  Over the years, many times

I have been asked by a woman “ why don’t you like to ejaculate. Dr R’s

claim is seriously flawed. There are many witnesses that would suggest

Dr R’s testimony is completely untrue.
 

However, DR R’s  claim about a massage is erroneous. In Dr R’s letter

 to the HDC, he indeed provides evidence of the state of my scrotum.

DR R’s own words Point 2 & Point 4(i) don’t add up
 

6)       I have a letter from a Urologist, prior to Dr R,  that clearly says that the

sensations I experience are not accompanied by any pain.

 

7)       MAY 2013 -  Mr Urologist, Tauranga (a good man) letter says I now have a

high-rising left testicle and it would be unwise to touch it. So, everything

 certainly wasn’t normal one month later.
 

Mr Tauranga’s letter CLEARLY shows that something changed. The letter

 backs up my claim that indeed something had happened.

Point 2 in DR R’s own words & Point 7  also back up my claim.
 

8)       OCT 2013 – Urologist, Mr N, Whangarei pulls up & under my left testicle,

         rather vigourously.
 

9)       NOV 2013 - Following an examination with Mr N, Whangarei,

photos clearly shows bruising to my perinneal area following Mr N's,

Whangarei’s examination. Five medical professionals confirm bruising, a

bleed or a haemorrhage occurred.

The bruising clearly shows that something has occurred here.
 

10)   JAN 2014 -  I received a letter from Manukau Health  with a cc to Dr R

regarding this pain. This is clear evidence that Dr R examination was under

a false belief that I had pain. It backs up my  claim that an examination

was carried out where he acted under a false pretence regarding

non-existent pain.
 

11)   JUN 2014 – Dr F examines me & his letter refers me to a Urologist for a left

testicle that won’t stay down once held down. This backs up my claim as to

 what Mr Urologist, Whangarei caused to happen.

 

12)   JUN 2014 – Urologist, Mr H, Hamilton  (after twisting the top of my left testicle) 

says on tape that my left testicle has “fallen over”.   Mr H, Hamilton

 does not mention this in his report.

So was it Urologist, Mr H's Hamilton’s “twisting” or Urologist, Mr N's Whangarei                  
that  caused it to fall over !!

 

13)   Jun 2014 – Photos taken after Mr H, Hamilton examination show a

‘freakish’ left testicle.

The photos clearly backup my claim as to what Mr H, Hamilton did.
 

14)   JUL  2014 – Dr F re-examines me after Mr H's, Hamilton examination

and says on tape that “it does not look well”. This further backs up my claim.
 

15)   MAR  2015 – I claimed that Urologist, Dr M, Hastings lifted my testicle way up

in such a manner that it caused the connective tissue between the perineum

and bottom of scrotum to separate. 
 

Urologist # 7 & Urologist # 9 (both good men) saw me before & after

Mr Urologist, Hastings's examination.

 

16)   MAY to JUN 2015 - Mr Urologist # 7 says on tape that my septum has dropped

and many times refers to the “space’ under my testicles. He continually agrees

with me and when asked a direct question as to whether it is now different, ums

& ars before saying it just looks different.

This clearly indicates something has occurred here.

 

17)   MAY to JUN 2015 - Mr Urologist # 9  says on tape that the shape of my

perineum  has changed.

This too clearly indicates that something has occurred here.
 

18)   JUL 2015 – Urologist # 7 merely puts in writing in a one sentence summary

that my scrotum is clearly descending further down the perineum.

 

19)   JUN 2015 – When approached again, Mr Urologist # 7  says on tape that

something has “given way” and that the dartos, the septum everything has

dropped.  

BUT puts nothing further in writing.

 

20)   JUL 2015 – When querying  with Urologist # 9  as to why he had not

acknowledged what had happened, he says on tape that he has

not disagreed with what I have said.

But he still puts nothing in writing.

 

WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON ALL THIS. WHO WILL YOU TRUST    !!!

 

___________________________________________________________________________

 

Most Urologists indulge in the practise of manipulating the dartos, particularly

around the septum. Probably in the area where the dartos joins the perineum

to the bottom area of the septum, where the 2 sides of the dartos fuse at

the back.

I BELIEVE This manipulation is an undeniable FACT.

This manipulation alters tension on the side of the scrotum that they are

manipulating, plus also alters tension in the perineum.   It can & sometimes

does cause loss of tension & damage to the nerves.

 

When this area is stretched it can ‘ping’ back to its initial state BUT it can cause

this area to stretch PERMANENTLY.   – FACT

 

ITS CALLED UNLAWFUL AND WILFUL ABUSE BY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS