UROLOGY ABUSERS

UROLOGY ABUSE 08 April 2021 UROLOGISTS WHO ABUSE THEIR PATIENTS AND THE HEALTH DSIABILITIES COMMISSION (HDC), New Zealand, WHO seemingly SUPPORT this ABUSE It is important that YOU are aware of Urology abuse. On Oct 2013, I had an appointment with Urologist Mr N of Whangarei , New Zealand. The purpose of this appointment , was for a discussion. After gaining ,my confidence he convinced me to have a Urology examination. This examination was ‘very firm’ & during the examination I said , it hurt. As a result of the examination I had a haemorrhage & bruising in my perinneal area. Five medical professionals confirmed bruising or a haemorrhage had occurred. I made a complaint to the HDC with names & supplied taped conversations. In reply to my complaint to the HDC, Mr N made no reference to the haemorrhage when replying to the HDC. Likewise when the HDC dismissed my complaint, no reference was made to the bruising, haemorrhage or evidence supplied. On Mar 2015, I had an appointment with Urologist, Dr M of Hastings, New Zealand. Once again the purpose of this appointment , was for a discussion. With the way the discussion went , he gained my confidence to let him examine me. Prior to the examination, I gave him very firm instructions of what he should not do (on tape which was later supplied to the HDC). Dr M of Hastings immediately proceeded to do, what I had asked him not to do. As a result my perinneal area collapsed & dropped. After this appointment I saw 2 further Urologists who had seen me before & after Dr M’s appointment. Both Urologists confirmed ( on tape which was later supplied to the HDC that things had changed. The first said the ‘dartos’ had become lower. The second said that something had given away. When I asked him what had given way in the perinneal area, he said ‘a bit of everything’. In reply to this complaint to the HDC, New Zealand, I received no evidence of response from DR M of Hastings to my complaint. The HDC made no comment in regard to the taped conversations (my proof). They made no comment what had happened. The HDC simply said they were satisified with the events that had taken place. In my view, there is little doubt the HDC is a protectionist body for Urology Abusers. When you have an appointment with an Urologist, there are good ones, but there are bad ones who carry out manipulative procedures without asking your permission & without telling you would they intend to do. It is Urology abuse, a form of rape against your wishes. Make no mistake, I found the HDC support these abusers. The clock is ticking